| The
California Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) withdrew its
Public Health Goal (PHG) for total chromium in drinking water
in November 2001.
The decision came
three months after an expert panel—convened by the
University of California on behalf of the OEHHA to review the
chromium 6 science—released its report stating there is no
evidence that chromium 6 causes cancer in humans when consumed
in water.
The panel proposed
that, until the a more definitive study is complete,
California should continue to consider its current drinking
water standard (maximum contaminant level) of 50 ppb for
"total chromium" to be protective of public health.
The federal standard is 100 ppb. The U.C. panel’s report is
available online at www.oehha.ca.gov/public_info/facts/pdf/crpanelrptfinal901.pdf
OEHHA and the
California Department of Health Services (CDHS) committed in
March 2001 to develop the nation’s first PHG and drinking
water standard specifically for chromium 6, also known as
hexavalent chromium. The chromium 6 PHG, which OEHHA will
develop by Spring 2003, will replace the withdrawn PHG for
"total" chromium consisting of both chromium 6 and
chromium 3, an essential nutrient.
DHS will use the
new PHG to develop a chromium 6 drinking water standard.
Legislation signed by Governor Gray Davis in October 2001
(Senate Bill 351 by Senator Deborah Ortiz) requires DHS to
adopt a chromium 6 drinking water standard by January 2004.
A major study
planned by the National Toxicology Project at the request of
OEHHA and CDHS, will hopefully provide definitive data of the
cancer risks of chromium 6 in drinking water. The federal
study is expected to take up to five years to complete.
northern
california cancer study
In August 2001, at the request of the Santa Cruz County Public
Health Department, the Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry at the
Northern California Cancer Center completed a review of the
incidence of lung and overall cancer occurring in areas served
by District wells having detected levels of chromium 6.
This analysis revealed no apparent excess of
either lung cancer or overall cancer incidence among residents
receiving water from wells in Rio Del Mar, Aptos, and La Selva
Beach compared to the rest of the region.
aromas
red sands source water assessment
In April 2002, a source
water assessment that investigated potential
contamination sources and the susceptibility of the District’s
drinking water wells to identified contamination threats was
completed by Todd Engineers. The study identifies onsite
residential septic systems and potential leakage from sewer
lines as the greatest threat to the District’s drinking
water wells in the Aromas Red Sands Aquifer.
An additional component of the study
analyzes the probable cause of the occurrence of chromium 6 in
the Aromas Red Sands Aquifer and the potential for increased
concentrations of chromium 6 due to in-home reverse osmosis
systems in areas using septic systems for wastewater disposal.
The study could find no man-made sources of
chromium 6 and found that environmental conditions tend to
favor chromium 6 production from dissolved trivalent chromium
found in the local geology. These findings led to the
conclusion that the occurrence of chromium 6 in the aquifer is
natural.
Reverse osmosis systems can result in a
significant increase in water usage depending on the type of
system used. Reverse osmosis discharges to the regional
wastewater treatment plant will have little impact on
groundwater quality, while discharges to onsite septic systems
can infiltrate groundwater. Point of use systems (treatment at
the tap) will have little impact on water use or chromium 6
concentrations in groundwater due to the small amount of the
water supply that is treated. Point of entry (all water
flowing into the house is treated) reverse osmosis systems can
more than double the amount of water used by the household,
potentially overloading septic systems and the discharged
wastewater may have chromium 6 concentrations two to three
times that of the inflow water supply.
Copies of the Source Water Assessment
Executive Summary are available free-of-charge at the District
headquarters office.
potential
proposition 50 grant funding
A grant proposal for a pilot treatment project for chromium 6
in District wells is included in the list of priority projects
for Santa Cruz County being considered for Proposition 50 (Water Bond)
funding. At this time, there are no
guarantees that a grant would be awarded.
|